back| <<Child Welfare Manual>>
<< Chapter 4 >> | <<Previous>> | <<Next>>

4.5  Alleged Perpetrator Appeal Process Overview

When the alleged perpetrator disagrees with the Division’s finding of child abuse or neglect by a Preponderance of Evidence (POE), he or she may appeal and has two avenues to seek an independent review of the Division’s decision. The alleged perpetrator must choose one or the other avenue of review, but cannot choose both. The methods of review are:

Administrative Review:

The alleged perpetrator can seek administrative review if:

If the perpetrator files a timely request, the Division cannot list the alleged perpetrator’s name in the Central Registry until such time as the Child Abuse and Neglect Review Board (CANRB) reviews and upholds the Division’s decision. The Administrative Review Process will involve a local Administrative Review, and may involve a review by the CANRB and a De Novo Judicial Review at the Circuit Court.

Direct Judicial Review:

The alleged perpetrator can choose to waive his or her right to the Administrative Review process and proceed directly to a De Novo Judicial Review by filing a petition in Circuit Court within thirty (30) days of the date that he or she received the CS-21.

By filing directly with the Circuit Court, the alleged perpetrator has waived his or her right to the Administrative Review process, and, therefore, his or her name may be placed on the Central Registry.

Notice will be provided to the Division in the form of a summons and a copy of the petition from the Circuit Court.  When the Division receives notice that the perpetrator has filed for Direct Judicial Review, Division staff shall:

Senate Bill 54 (2011) Review

Pursuant to section 210.152 RSMo., the Children's Division may reopen a case for review if:

  1. new, specific, and credible evidence is obtained that the Division's decision was based on fraud or misrepresentation of material facts, and
  2.  there is credible evidence that absent such fraud or misrepresentation the division' decision would have been different. 

These reviews may be requested by an alleged perpetrator; an alleged victim; an alleged victim's parent, legal custodian, or legal guardian if the victim is under age 18; or the Office of the Child Advocate.  

These requests are accepted from the point a preponderance of the evidence preliminary finding becomes final up to one (1) year.  The conclusion becomes final when:

These cases shall not be reopened for review while the case is pending before a court of this state nor when a court has entered a final judgment after de novo judicial review pursuant to section 210.152.

Related Subject:  Section 2, Chapter 4.5.4 Senate Bill 54 Review; and Section 2, Chapter 4.5.4.1   Senate Bill 54 Review Procedure

Chapter Memoranda History: (prior to 1/31/07)

CS03-46, CS03-51, CD04-69, CD04-79, CD04-89, CD05-35, CD05-40, CD05-50, CD05-51, CD05-68, CD05-72, CD06-09, CD06-15, CD06-34, CD06-67, CD06-78

Memoranda History:

CD07-25, CD07-50, CD08-22, CD07-50, CD08-22, CD09-76, CD10-69, CD11-75